Fau
any are
See
mo
wh the
the judes
jळेल
whs
are very lightly worked shd harn more
ban.
else.
1
Express agra
Si m.
he hatte aus
visaar
the Boys
Sees
no
af
say
Chal
for departing
for
practice
the g
Colay
the previous
REI
* /10
The point is that the C.J. claims the right
to have out of the Colony during the Court vaca-
A
tion in addition to six weeks vacation leave such
as an ordinary Civil Servant gets. It is out
of the question. If the C.. remains in the
Colony during Court vacation he can have six
weeks vacation at another time, but if he goes
away during Court vacation that must count as
part of the six weeks. Even so he is better off
than other officers, since he gets a local holi-
day besides ordinary leave.
& reply that the C.J. cannot have more
than six weeks full pay leave out of the Colony
in respect of any one year, whether the leave occurs
during Court vacation or not.
ACC 3/10 agree M. 3 Jagree
offronson atome Hi
4/10
No.2/1.
Hongkong.
3244
Jes
ET hywett to Col. Seay d 3/6/0
mer to Mr II Pygolt a bes
£ jiggott to Governor 19/6/08
120 € ! * J. ] Piggott zijk's
H
#7 Just to Governor - 8/8/06
21 Juggott a 13/8/
or 6 Lex F1
| #J Ayjott & Governor a ma
ense to the FT Piggott. Asid
1.
Aggost to Governor 7/5/06
Knot
to Fin II Piggott a 20/5/06
to
be dir Higgott a gapple
My Lord,
107
C
35261
KEC:
Red 24 SEP 06
Government House,
Hongkong, 23rd. August, 1906.
Referring to Mr. Lyttelton's despatch
No.22 dated the 7th. February, 1905, enclosing a let-
ter from Mr. C.P.Lucas to Mr. (now Sir) F.T.Piggott,
on the subject of the treatment of Judges in this
Colony in the matter of vacation leave, I have the
honour to enclose copies of correspondence which has
taken place with Sir Francis Piggott since he has been
in Hongkong from which it will be seen that he claims
that leave of absence granted to the Chief Justice on
full pay during the Court vacation does not count as
part of the 3 months vacation leave in 2 years to
which, an there is no vacation in this Colony exceed-
ing one month at one time, he is entitled as an ordin-
ary civil servant.
2. I do not consider this contention is
supported by No.133 of the Rules and Regulations of
THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
THE EARL OF ELGIN,
K.G.,
&C.
&C.
80. •
His
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.